Which statement accurately reflects the relationship between divided government and party strength?

The statement that the relationship between divided government and party strength is ambiguous recognizes the complexity of how these two factors interact in the American political system. Divided government occurs when one party controls the presidency while another party controls one or both houses of Congress. This scenario can lead to conflicts in policy-making and requires negotiation and compromise.

The ambiguity in this relationship stems from the fact that divided government can both weaken and strengthen political parties. On one hand, it may expose party divisions and highlight weaknesses, as parties may struggle to present a unified front or to accomplish their legislative goals. On the other hand, it can also galvanize party bases and increase political mobilization for elections, as parties rally to regain control of the government.

Analyzing the impact of divided government on party strength is therefore not straightforward: it varies depending on the political context, electoral cycles, and the specific issues at play. This complexity stands in contrast to a clearer relationship in which one factor consistently influences the other in a direct manner.